Skip to main content

Instructional Topics

Teaching Strategies, B.G. Davis

Tools for Teaching, Davis, B.G., Jossey-Bass; San Francisco, 1993.

A compendium of classroom-tested strategies and suggestions designed to improve the teaching practices of all college instructors, including beginning, mid-career, and senior faculty members. The book describes 49 teaching tools that cover both traditional practical tasks--writing a course syllabus, delivering an effective lecture--as well as newer, broader concerns such as responding to diversity on campus and coping with budget constraints.

Please note that some of the chapters below have been modified from the original version.

[Tools for Teaching by Barbara Gross Davis; Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco, 1993.
Chapters may not be copied or reprinted without permission.]

Table of contents

Getting Underway
1. Preparing or Revising a Course
2. The Course Syllabus
3. The First Day of Class
Responding to a Diverse Student Body
4. Academic Accommodations for Students with Disabilities
5. Diversity and Complexity in the Classroom: Considerations of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender
6. Reentry Students
7. Teaching Academically Diverse Students
Discussion Strategies
8. Leading a Discussion
9. Encouraging Student Participation in Discussion
10. Asking Questions
11. Fielding Students' Questions
Lecture Strategies
12. Preparing to Teach the Large Lecture Course
13. Delivering a Lecture
14. Explaining Clearly
15. Personalizing the Large Lecture Class
16. Supplements and Alternatives to Lecturing: Encouraging Student Participation
17. Maintaining Instructional Quality with Limited Resources
Collaborative and Experiential Strategies
18. Collaborative Learning: Group Work and Study Teams
19. Role Playing and Case Studies
20. Field Work
Enhancing Students' Learning and Motivation
21. Helping Students Learn
22. Learning Styles and Preferences
23. Motivating Students
Writing Skills and Homework Assignments
24. Helping Students Write Better in All Courses
25. Designing Effective Writing Assignments
26. Evaluating Students' Written Work
27. Homework: Problem Sets
Testing and Grading
28. Quizzes, Tests, and Exams
29. Allaying Students' Anxieties About Tests
30. Multiple-Choice and Matching Tests
31. Short-Answer and Essay Tests
32. Grading Practices
33. Calculating and Assigning Grades
34. Preventing Academic Dishonesty
Instructional Media and Technology
35. Chalkboards
36. Flipcharts
37. Transparencies and Overhead Projectors
38. Slides
39. Films and Videotapes
40. Computers and Multimedia
Evaluation to Improve Teaching
41. Fast Feedback
42. Watching Yourself on Videotape
43. Self-Evaluation and the Teaching Dossier
Teaching Outside the Classroom
44. Holding Office Hours
45. Academic Advising and Mentoring Undergraduates
46. Guiding, Training, and Supervising Graduate Student Instructors
Finishing Up
47. The Last Days of Class
48. Student Rating Forms
49. Writing Letters of Recommendation

Copyright ©Jossey-Bass. Tools for Teaching may not be copied or reprinted without permission from Jossey-Bass. If you would like to purchase a copy and are unable to locate Tools for Teaching at a local bookstore you can purchase it through Amazon.com or Jossey-Bass.
 

E-Portfolios

E-Portfolios@UD site

Teaching, Learning, and Assessment (TLA) Newsletter focused on E-Portfolio implementation at UD (pdf)

Conceptual framework for E-Portfolio design and implementation, CFEE, 2010S (pdf)

Netiquette and Guidelines for Undergraduate Students' ePortfolio Development (pdf)

Promotion and Tenure

Promotion and Tenure (.doc)
Summary of annual faculty panel discussions: Planning ahead and preparing for the promotion and tenure process; putting the dossier together and the role of external reviewers; and addressing promotion and tenure policies and procedures effectively.

Promotion & Tenure Process at UD by Eric Kmiec, Chairperson, University Promotions & Tenure Committee; Professor, Biological Sciences, 2007 P&T panel (ppt)

P&T Advice by Yan Jin, Professor, Plant & Soil Sciences, 2007 P&T panel (ppt)

P&T Advice by Raul Lobo, Professor, Chemical Engineering, 2007 P&T panel  (ppt)

Your Tenure Narrative, Leakie, M. & St. John, K. review the elements of a personal statement key to the tenure application. Inside Higher Education, November 10, 2010.

Faculty Handbook: Promotion and Tenure

Time Management Workshop 2008

Time Management Workshop
Presented by the Center for Teaching Effectiveness
November 5th 2008
Presenters
 Julie Lloyd, Doctoral Candidate, Biological Sciences
Lauren Miltenberger, Doctoral Candidate, Public Policy
Nick Galasso, Doctoral Candidate, Political Science & International Relations
Lydia Romano, Doctoral Candidate, Psychology

Listed below are highlights from the workshop's presenters.

Julie Lloyd – “Using a Life Rubric”

Julie demonstrated how to use a “Life Rubric,” which is designed to help individuals envision how they will reach the goals they set for themselves. Life Coach Susan Robinson developed the rubric and introduced it to Julie at last year’s Lilly East Conference.
 
To use the rubric (see below), insert all aspects of your life that you consider a priority. For instance, Julie talked about her career goals to become a professor, as well as her goals for her personal life, such as a happy marriage, good health, and strong finances.

After inserting your priorities, list where you desire to be in five years concerning each. Julie said that in terms of her professional aspirations, her goal is to be a respected and widely published tenure-track Assistant Professor. She also plans that in five years she will have a nicely remodeled home and will be happily married to her current boyfriend. Julie said that during this part of the exercise it is important to be idealistic and that we should orient our goals to the best possible outcome we can envision. It is also important for the rubric that our goals are self-driven, instead of reflecting what others may want for us. What exactly do each of us personally desire for our lives? 

Working from the right to the left (with the right column reflecting our most desirable outcomes), list the next possible scenario for each of our goals. That is, in five years what scenario for our lives would be satisfying, though not totally ideal.  Julie mentioned that her second best category might indicate that while she may have achieved her ideal professional goals, she may still be trying to remodel her home.

The final column to the left should indicate what our life looks like in five years if we fail to reach our goal for that area. For instance, for Julie this implied not having a tenure-track position, or being happily married, or still renting an apartment instead of remodeling a new home. 
       

Example of a "Life Rubric"- Where do you see yourself in five years?

  Poor 1 2 3 Satisfactory 4 5 Excellent
Career adjunct prof tenture track Asst. Prof, but struggling tenure trach Asst. Prof, but not finding "fit" tenure trach Asst. Prof, but few publications Tenture trach Asst. Prof, lots of publications, good students, well respected by colleagues
Mate single not married, serious relationship married, but little time to together   happily married, lots of time together
Home renting apartment own home, but not remodeled own home, but only 1/2 remodeled own home, 3/4 remodeled, just built garage own fabulous remodeled home, affordable mortgage
Health regularly using sick days   good diet, some exercise   Ideal weight; toned & strong; balanced diet; just regular check-ups

 

Lauren Miltenberger - "Making Calendars"

Lauren discussed the importance of starting the semester by placing all of our commitments and responsibilities on a master calendar. She stressed the importance of placing just about everything that consumes our time on the calendar. For her, this includes her husband’s schedule, doctors appointments for her children, due dates for paper assignments, days she needs to pick up her children or when they have play dates. Listing everything that requires your time allows you to gain a big picture view of your life and semester. It also helps to indicate which weeks will be more stressful than others so that you can prepare ahead of time. For instance, by listing everything on her calendar, Lauren can plan ahead to have someone else pick up her children from school during the week's shehas exams.

After making a master schedule for the entire semester, Lauren can then extrapolate a weekly schedule.  

Some tips: Lauren suggests that we need to take care in estimating how long our various tasks will take before we put them on the calendar. In fact, she recommends putting estimated time lengths on the calendar itself. From there, she discusses the importance of remaining disciplined to our time limits so that we stay on course. This means, however, that sometimes tasks may not be perfect. This is the trade off, unfortunately, for being a busy and productive individual.


“Time Management Quiz”
Have you ever wondered, “Where does all of my time go?!” Lauren introduced a “Time Management Quiz” to helps us figure how we spend our time each week. The quiz asks us to list how much time we spend engaged in all of our activities. For instance, how much time do we spend commuting to work, answering email, preparing meals, grocery shopping, and working on school projects? From here, we can determine what is taking up our time and begin to manage it more effectively.


Where Does Time Go?  Take this quiz to find out

 A good place to start in improving time management is understanding your current situation.  Answer the below questions as honestly as possible to give yourself a clearer picture about how many hours a day you have to accomplish everything on your lists.

  1. On the average, how many hours do you sleep in each 24 hour period?
  2. On the average, how many hours a day do you spend on meals, including preparation and clean-up time?
  3. How much time do you spend commuting to and from campus and how many times do you do this during a week?  Include the amount of time it takes to park and walk from your car or the bus stop to class.
  4. On the average, how many hours a day do you spend doing errands?
  5. On the average, how many hours do you spend each week doing co-curricular activities (student organizations, working out, volunteering, etc.)?
  6. On the average, how many hours a week do you work at a job?
  7. How many hours do you spend in class each week?
  8. On the average, how many hours per week do you spend with friends, going out, watching TV, going to parties, etc?
  9. How many hours a day do you spend on email, Facebook, the Internet?

The questions that ask about daily habits, multiply by 7, then add to that the weekly amounts.  Calculate your total hours from the above and then subtract it from 168 – which is the total number of hours in a week.  This is how many hours you have left to study, write papers, grade exams, etc.

Julie Lloyd – “Time Management Tool”

Julie introduced another rubric developed by Susan Robinson called the, “Time Management Tool.” This rubric allows us to design a workable timeline for the various projects ongoing in our personal and professional lives. The purpose of the rubric is to allow us to track our progress to ensure that we complete them on schedule. A nice feature of this approach is that it breaks our large projects into smaller, manageable tasks so that we avoid becoming overwhelmed.  

The rubric works by listing specific projects in the far left column and indicating a deadline for that project in the far right column. Working backwards from the project’s deadline, we place in each box the tasks that must be completed and when along the way towards finishing the whole project. For instance, Julie listed her dissertation as the first project on her rubric. Her deadline to submit the dissertation is January 2009. Working backwards she lists the smaller deadlines associated with completing the project, such as when she will submit chapters for review. While Julie’s rubric is listed by what she will complete month to month, the time-period can be adjusted to your specific project. For instance, if you plan to loose 10 pounds this month the time columns can indicate weeks instead of months.

Example of Time Management Tool

Project/Date 27 Oct 10 Nov 24 Nov 8 Dec 22 Dec 5 Jan 12 Jan
Thesis
a. revise paper
b. resubmit paper       
c. outlining chap1                    
a. writing chap1 sections              
b. format chap3   
a. submit written thesis to committee
a. Possible Defense date
a. Corrections
 
a. SUBMIT completed thesis to graduate office
Other project
a. find tungsten material and contact machinist                 
b. check w J.Dykins about TD-EI MS
a. writing!
         
Post Doc
a. sign contract & HR forms                    
a. read up on DESI for research
     
a. Start date at USP
a. First day of Classes
CTE Workshop
a. finish handouts by Nov 1           
b. meet at 3:45 pm on Nov 5th
           
Job Interviews
a. contact Bloom about second TT opening
           

 

Nick Galasso “List Fundamentals”

Nick discussed certain fundamental points about making and keeping lists. His points were inspired and partially borrowed from life coach Brian Tracy.

First, it’s extremely to important to write down the things that you must accomplish throughout your day. This is largely psychological, as we often feel overwhelmed by all of the things we know we need to do. However, when we write things down we often realize that those things are not as daunting as they seem. Therefore, writing things down helps to lower our stress levels.

Second, one of the major problems people have with lists is that they fail to prioritize or rank the items on their list. The problem with this is that we often will do the things on our list first that are the easiest and often the least important. If, at the end of the day, we look at our list and all we’ve accomplished are the trivial items instead of the important things our stress level may increase. A good rule of thumb to help us rank order our lists is to imagine that we unexpectedly have to leave town tomorrow and we will not return for over a month. What are the items on the list that we must absolutely accomplish before we leave? Those items,  obviously, rank at the top of our lists.

Third, Respect the list! Practice discipline in regards to the lists we create. Do not stray from the list that you have made. Throughout our day things emerge and present themselves as issues or tasks that require our immediately attention. This threatens to disrupt our carefully planned days and potentially pushes our priorities into tomorrow.  When this happens, we must be able to confront the new task, write it down on our list, and rank its importance with respect to the other items.

Fourth, And what happens if we don’t finish our list at the end of the day? Transfer those things to tomorrow’s list.

Fifth, Schedule time to make your lists. Nick says that he often makes two lists, one on Sunday and one at the end of each day. The list he makes on Sunday contains all of the things he needs to accomplish for the week. At the end of each day he makes his list for the next day. 

Characteristics of Constructive Feedback

 Constructive Feedback is*:

  1. descriptive rather than evaluative. By describing one's own reactions ("I" messages vs "you" messages), the individual receiving the feedback can freely choose to use it or not.  Avoiding evaluative language reduces the need for the recipient to respond  in a defensive manor.
  2. specific rather than general. To be told that one is "domineering" will probably not be as useful as to be told that "in the conversation that just took place, you did not appear to be listening to what others were saying, and I felt forced to accept your arguments."  Or "When you have something important to say, you sometimes use more words than you need.  For example, just now·."
  3.  focused on the behaviors rather than on the person.  It is important that we refer to what a person does rather than to what we think or imagine. Thus we might say that a person "talked more than anyone else in this meeting" rather than that the person is a "loud-mouth."  The former allows for the possibility of change; the latter is judgemental, implies a fixed personality trait, and may be the perception of only one person.
  4. considers the needs of both the receiver and giver of feedback. Feedback can be destructive when it serves only our own needs and fails to consider the needs of the person the receiving the feedback.   Feedback should be given to help, not to hurt. We too often give feedback because it makes us feel better or gives us a psychological advantage.
  5. directed toward changeable behaviors which the receiver can do something about.  Frustration is only increased when a person is reminded of some shortcoming over which there is no control (e.g., a physical disability).
  6. solicited rather than imposed.  Feedback is most useful when the receiver has formulated the kind of question that  those who are observing can answer or when the person actively seeks feedback.  For example, "I would find it helpful to know what went well in that session and what would make it go even better next time."
  7. well timed.  In general, feedback is most useful at the earliest opportunity after the given behavior (depending, of course, on the person's readiness to hear it, support available from others, and so forth).  The reception and use of feedback involves many possible emotional reactions.  Excellent feedback presented at an inappropriate time may do more harm than good.
  8. given in limited amounts of information the receiver can use rather than the amount we would like to give.  To overload a person with feedback is to reduce the possibility that he or she may be able to use it effectively.  When we give advice we tell the person what to do, and to some degree take away her/his freedom to decide.
  9. well thought out before being offered.  It is often useful to reflect on one's own "buttons" and their origins before deciding that "the other person" needs to hear your feedback.  Getting clear about your own motivations for giving feedback is very useful.
 

This material has been gleaned over the years from several resources.  The following are particularly helpful in understanding the feedback process:

Beer, J. E. with Stief, E.  The Mediator's Handbook.  Developed by Friends Conflict Resolution Programs, 3rd Edition.  Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers, 1997.
Drury, Susanne S.  Assertive Supervision: Building Involved Teamwork.  Champaign, IL:  Research  Press, 1984.
University of Pittsburgh, Office of Faculty Development

Classroom Assessment

Classroom teachers can learn much about how students learn and how they respond to particular teaching approaches through close observation of students in the process of learning, through the collection of frequent feedback on students' learning, and through the design and use of modest classroom experiments.  Classroom assessment can help individual instructors obtain useful feedback on what, how much, and how well their students are learning.  Faculty can then use this information to refocus their teaching to help students make their learning more efficient and more effective. 

 
  • Characteristics of Classroom Assessment:  Classroom  assessment is an approach designed to help teachers find out what students are learning in the classroom and how well they are learning it.  This approach is:
  • Learner-Centered:  Classroom assessment focuses the attention of teachers and students on observing and improving learning, rather than on observing and improving teaching.
  • Teacher-Directed:  No one can provide teachers with rules that will tell them what to do from moment to moment in the dynamic learning environment of a college classroom.  Classroom assessment respects the autonomy, academic freedom, and professional judgment of college faculty.
  • Mutually Beneficial:  Because it is focused on learning, classroom assessment requires the active participation of students.  By cooperating in assessment, students reinforce their grasp of the course content and strengthen their own evaluation skills.
  • Formative:  Classroom assessment is a formative rather than a summative approach to assessment.  Its purpose is to improve the quality of student learning, not to provide evidence for evaluating or grading students.  Its aim is to provide faculty with information on what, how much, and how well students are learning, in order to help them better prepare to succeed - both on the subsequent graded evaluations and in the world beyond the classroom.
  • Context-Specific:  To be most useful, classroom assessments have to respond to the particular needs and characteristics of the teachers, students, and disciplines to which they are applied.  Each class has its own particular dynamic, its own collective personality, its own "chemistry."  This is true even for different sections of the same course.
  • Ongoing:  Classroom assessment is an ongoing process, perhaps best thought of as the creation and maintenance of a classroom "feedback look."  By employing a number of simple classroom assessment techniques that are quick and easy to use, teachers get feedback from students on their learning.
  • Rooted in Good Teaching Practice:  Most college teachers already collect some feedback on their students' learning and use that feedback to inform their teaching.  Classroom assessment is an attempt to build on existing good practice by making it more systematic, more flexible, and more effective.

Examples of Two Classroom Assessment Techniques
The One-Minute Paper provides a way to obtain input about how well students comprehend the context of a lecture or discussion.  To initiate the process, the instructor stops the class a few minutes (3-4) before the end of the period and asks students to respond to some variation of two questions designed to find out what it the most important thing they learned and what subject matter remains unclear.  The process provides student self-assessment process with which the instructor can not only obtain a sense of how well the students are or are not learning important material, but also see how they use important language related to the content and skill of the course.  In addition, as Cross and Angelo (1993) suggest, the Minute Paper assesses more than mere recall.  To select the most important or significant information, learners must first evaluate what they recall.  Then, to come up with a question, students must self-assess, asking themselves how well they understand what they have just heard or studied (p. 148).
  • The One-Minute Paper

            Please answer each question in 1 or 2 sentences:

    1.  What was the most useful or meaningful thing you learned during this session?
    2.  What question(s) remain uppermost in your mind as we end this session?

The use of the Muddiest Point Question provides a way for instructors to obtain feedback about what students find unclear about assignments, lectures, discussions, laboratory exercises, tutorials, etc.  When administered at an appropriate moment, the process provides a way for students to reflect on what they have heard/done and identity information, steps, or ideas where they are having difficulty.  In this way, it requires that students go beyond simple recall of information to some of the higher order thinking such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.  For the instructor, the technique provides an efficient way to get a sense of where students are having difficulty and determining the next steps for helping students master difficult information or skills.  As Cross and Angelo (1993) suggest, "It is particularly suited to large, lower-division classes.  Since students' responses to the Muddiest Point question usually consists of a few words or phrases, a teacher can read and sort a great many in a few minutes" (p. 154). 
  • The "Muddiest" Point**
        
      What was the "muddiest" point so far in this session? 
      (In other words, what was least clear to you?)

A Sampling of Classroom Assessment Techniques
  • Background Knowledge Probe - student familiarity with terms or basic problems in topic area is assessed.
  • Teaching Goals Inventory (modified) - teachers compare their goals with those of the students.
  • Focused Listing - students free association of terms associated with topic.
  • Directed paraphrasing - putting key terms into their own words.
  • Appropriate Analogies - students generate linkages between class material and other knowledge.
  • One-Minute Paper/Summaries - students identify key points from the class session.
  • Muddiest Point - students identify the most unclear part of the class session.
  • One Sentence Summary - class material is boiled down to one sentence.
  • Applications Card - students pull out key ideas and how they might apply them.
  • Group Informal Feedback on Teaching - students work in small groups to generate course feedback.
  • Pro and Con Grid - analysis of a key idea or approach.
  • Word Journals - one word is chosen to represent the class/week around which the student writes a journal entry explaining their choice of words.
  • Concrete Maps - free association of terms and subsequent visual mapping of relationships.
  • Human Tableau/Class Modeling - different points of the room are used to represent choices, students are posed questions and then locate appropriately.
  • Classroom Opinion/Problem Poll - teacher poses multiple choice questions, students respond on held-up cards.
  • Punctuated Lecture - teacher stops lecture at 1-2 points and asks students to reflect on what they are learning and how.
  • Electronic Mail Feedback - feedback about the course is requested over email/list-serv.
  • Student Management Teams/Quality Circles - students select a sub-group to regularly discuss class issues and content with the teacher.
  • Assignment Assessment/Reading Rating/Exam Evaluation - teacher asks students to evaluate the assignment/reading/exam on several criteria.


Article adapted from:  Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993).  Classroom assessment techniques:  A handbook for college teachers.  (2nd ed.) (pp. 3-6).  San Francisco:  Jossey-Bass.

From:  Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993).  Classroom assessment techniques:  A handbook for college teachers. (2nd ed.) (pp. 148-153).  San Francisco:  Jossey-Bass.
**This Classroom Assessment Technique was developed by Dr. Frederick Mosteller, a distinguished professor statistics at Harvard University.  For a detailed account of its development and use, see his article, The Muddiest Point in the Lecture" as a Feedback Device in On Teaching and Learning:  The Journal of the Harvard-Danford Center, Volume 3, April 1989, pages 10-21.  To request copies or reprints of the article, contact:  The Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning, 318 Science Center, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.

Comprehensive Resources

Tomorrow's Professor Mailing List, Stanford University

This mailing list, a product of the Stanford University Learning Laboratory, is sent free on a bi-weekly basis to subscribers, faculty, postdocs, and graduate students at colleges and universities around the world. Postings have been sent on such topics as: New faculty reward structures, preparing for academic careers, improving student learning, and writing successful proposals. Subscribe

IDEA Papers

IDEA Papers are short, research-based essays focused on a variety of teaching and evaluation issues ranging from leading discussions, teaching large classes to validity of student ratings.

The IDEA Center is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to serve colleges and universities committed to improving learning, teaching, and leadership performance.

Faculty Development Associates

Commercial site by Dr. Richard E. Lyons contains a link titled Online Resources, consisting of links to higher education publications, organizations, and topics. The site also has a link titled Teaching Tip of the Week, which offers suggestions geared to the particular time of the semester.

Resources in Science and Engineering Education 

Personal site by Dr. Richard M. Felder, Hoechst Celanese Professor Emeritus of Chemical Engineering at North Carolina State University. The site offers guidance on effective teaching techniques and tips and resources for using them in the classroom. Also contains highlights of news and research about teaching. 

Teaching With Technologies

EDUCAUSE Quarterly

Publication focused on technologies in higher education.

 

Academic Technology Services

UD's teaching and learning with technology center.

 

Implementing the Seven Principles: Technology as a Lever

This article elaborates seven principles designed to help faculty members, departments, colleges, and universities examine individual behaviors and institutional policies and practices for their consistency.

 

The World Lecture Hall

The World Lecture Hall contains links to courses taught via the Web by faculty worldwide. For example, you will find course syllabi, assignments, lecture notes, exams, class calendars, multimedia textbooks.

 

Evaluating Web Resources (Widener University)

While the Web has put millions of pages of information right at our fingertips, students often have a difficult time determining what is worthwhile and what is not. This site has just about everything you need to know about how to evaluate web resources. It covers advocacy, business, news, informational, and personal web pages and how to evaluate them. It also walks you through PowerPoint presentations and provides a list of bibliographical resources.

Syndicate content